Multiple Intelligence-based Instruction to Increase Students’ Intrinsic Motivation in Learning English
(1) UIN Walisongo Semarang
(2) UIN Walisongo Semarang
(3) Shahjalal University of Science and Technology
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The one-for-all approach has long been a concern in the educational field as it influences learners’ learning capacity negatively. However, it is still practiced by many teachers in Indonesia. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of Multiple Intelligence-based instruction to increase students’ intrinsic motivation in learning English. It used a quasi-experiment design, and the participants were 40 non-English department students in UIN Walisongo Semarang that were selected using purposive sampling. Activity Perception Questionnaire from Intrinsic Motivation Inventory was used to measure students’ experience of given activities. Analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test, it was found that Multiple Intelligence-based instruction was effective to enhance the value or usefulness, interest, and perceived choice of students. These aspects were critical in the process of internalization and integration, which led to higher intrinsic motivation.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ark, Tavinder, Lee R., B., & Eva, K. W. (2006). Giving Learners the Best of Both Worlds: Do Clinical Teachers Need to Guard Against Teaching Pattern Recognition to Novices? Journal of The Associasion of Americal Medical Colleges, 81(4), 405–409.
Armstrong, T. (2003, November). The Multiple Intelligences of Reading and Writing. Poplar Bluff R-I Schools, 2–3. http://pb.k12.mo.us/index.htm
Binet, A. (2012). The Development of Intelligence in Children. Forgotten Books.
Campbell, J. Y., Hilscher, J., & Szilagyi, J. (2008). In Search of Distress Risk. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2899–2939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01416.x
Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R. (2016). Motivation to Learn: An Overview of Contemporary Theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating Internalization: The Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1994). Promoting Self‐determined Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383940380101
Edwards-Schachter, M., García-Granero, A., Mabel Sánchez-Barrioluengo, ;, Quesada Pineda, H., & Amara, N. (2015). Disentangling Competences: Interrelationships on Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
Faidah, R. T., & Fauziati, E. (2019). Teachers Beliefs on Multiple Intelligence Based English Teaching for Young Learners. Exposure Journal 60 English Education Department, 8(1), 60–72.
Ganuthula, V. R. R., & Sinha, S. (2019). The Looking Glass for Intelligence Quotient Tests: The Interplay of Motivation, Cognitive Functioning, and Affect. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02857
Gardner, H., & Harvard, H. G. (2003). Multiple Intelligences After Twenty Years.
Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
Hanafin, J. (2014). Multiple Intelligences Theory, Action Research, and Teacher Professional Development: The Irish MI Project. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n4.8
Hannum, E., & Buchmann, C. (2005). Global Educational Expansion and Socio-Economic Development: An Assessment of Findings from the Social Sciences. World Development, 33(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.001
Heindl, M. (2020). An extended short scale for measuring intrinsic motivation when engaged in inquiry-based learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020057989
Jon, R. B., Embong, R., Purnama, B., & Wadi, A. S. (2021). The Challenges of English Language Teaching in Indonesia. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 158–168.
Kaufman, J. (2015). Why Creativity Isn’t in IQ Tests, Why it Matters, and Why it Won’t Change Anytime Soon Probably. Journal of Intelligence, 3(3), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3030059
Maulida, I. (2021). Implementation of English Learning Based on Multiple Intelligences on English Speaking Ability. Jurnal Scientia, 10(1). http://infor.seaninstitute.org/index.php/pendidikan
McKenzie, W. (2009). Walking the Walk: Multiple Intelligences in Educator Professional Development. Multiple Intelligences , 11–29.
Morgan, H. (2021). Celebrating Giants and Trailblazers in Creativity Research and Related Fields Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory and His Ideas on Promoting Creativity.
Ostrow, K. S., & Heffernan, N. T. (2020). Testing the validity and reliability of intrinsic motivation inventory subscales within ASSISTments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10947 LNAI, 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_28
Pordanjani, S. R.-, Fazilati, M., Bonab, B. G., & Pirbalouti, M. G. (2019). The Effectiveness of Instruction Based on Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences (TMI) on Career Self-Efficacy of Deaf Students. International Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.24200/ijpb.2019.115518
Ridwan, A. (2016). The Effectiveness of Multiple Intelligences (MI)-Based English Classroom Activities at The Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 2 Mamuju of West Sulawesi.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. The Guilford Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation From A Self-determination Theory Perspective: Definitions, Theory, Practices, and Future Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Shearer, C. B., & Karanian, J. M. (2017). The Neuroscience of Intelligence: Empirical Support for The Theory of Multiple Intelligences? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 6, 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2017.02.002
Soleimani, H., Moinnzadeh, A., Kassaian, Z., & Ketabi, S. (2012). The Effect of Instruction Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory on the Attitude and Learning of General English. English Language Teaching, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p45
Sternberg, R., & Williams, W. (2009). Educational Psychology (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of multiple intelligences based teaching strategy in enhancing the multiple intelligences and Science Process Skills of junior high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.404
Yaumi, M., Sirate, S. F. S., & Patak, A. A. (2018). Investigating Multiple Intelligence-Based Instructions Approach on Performance Improvement of Indonesian Elementary Madrasah Teachers. SAGE Open, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018809216
Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2012). Shortcomings of the IQ-Based Construct of Underachievement. Roeper Review, 34(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.660726
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 421 timesPDF - 46 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.