Virtual Manipulative-Aided Instruction (VMAI): Its Effects on Seventh-Grade Students' Conceptual Understanding in Fractions

Normalah P Solaiman(1*)


(1) Mindanao State University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Technology enhances education and addresses students' academic challenges. Excessive use of mobile phones and internet applications may contribute to students' poor academic performance. But, technology can also be an aid in improving learning outcomes. This study aimed to examine the influence of Virtual Manipulative Aided Instruction (VMAI) on Grade 7 students' conceptual understanding in solving fraction-related problems. A one-group experimental research design was employed, involving 55 Grade 7 students from three intact classes in selected national high schools in Lanao del Sur.  Findings revealed significant improvements in conceptual understanding skills. Results further showed that VMAI influenced conceptual understanding in the representation of fractions, conversion of improper fractions to mixed numbers and vice versa, and simplification of equivalent fractions. Overall, the findings suggest that VMAI serves as an effective instructional approach, fostering active engagement, motivation, and enhanced mathematical skills among students. The study underscores the potential of technology-assisted learning to enhance conceptual understanding in mathematics.


Keywords


Virtual Manipulative Aided Instruction, Conceptual Understanding, Technology in Learning, engagement, motivation, Fraction Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929

Bouck, E. C., Park, J., & Stenzel, K. (2020). Virtual manipulatives as assistive technology to support students with disabilities with mathematics. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(4), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1762157

Dueker, S. & Vanessa Desai, V. (2022). Considerations for Using Virtual Manipulatives & an Explicit Instruction Format in a Virtual Learning Environment. Thresholds Volume 45, Issue 1

Eyeoglu, O., Ozdemir, B., Eyeoglu, U. (2021). Conceptual understanding of 8th grade students based on big ideas: the case of measurement. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021472786

Haciomerglu, E. (2016). Object – spatial visualization and verbal cognitive styles and their relation to cognitive abilities and mathematical performance. Educational

Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16 (3). doi: 10.12738/estp.2016.0429

Horan & Carr, (2018). How much guidance do students need? An intervention study on kindergarten mathematics with manipulatives. http://www. Researchgate.net.DOI:10.17583/ijep.2018.3672

Hurst, C. & Linsell, C. (2020). Manipulatives and Multiplicative Thinking. STEM Education, 5(1), 04. http://doi.org/10.20807ejsteme/5808

Jonsson, B., Granberg, C., & Lithner, J. (2020). Gaining mathematical understanding: The effects of creative mathematical reasoning and cognitive proficiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 574366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574366

Kovačevič N. (2016). Spatial reasoning in mathematics. Teaching and Learning

Mathematics, 1 – 21.

Larbi, E. & Mavis, O. (2016). The use of Manipulatives mathematics education. Journal of education and practice, 7(36). ISSN 2222-288X

Laski, E., Jor’dan, J., Daourt, C. , & Murray, A. (2015 April – June Article). Creative Commons. DOI: 10.1177/21582440/5589588

Lee, C.-Y. & Chen, M.-J. (2015). Effects of worked examples using manipulatives

in Fifth Graders' learning performance and attitude toward mathematics.

Educational Technology and Society, 8(1), 214-275

Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Ramful, A. (2016). Spatial reasoning influences students’

performances in mathematics tasks. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Educational Research Group of Australasia, 404 – 417

Chinnappan, W. B. & Trenholm, S. (Eds)

Mills, S. (2016). Conceptual understanding: a concept analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(3), 546 – 557. http://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2308

Moser, T. & Chen, V. (2016). What is conceptual understanding? Paper Presented in ISTE

Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Westenskow, A., Salkind, G., & Tucker, S. (2016). A review of virtual manipulatives research: From the beginning. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 1-26.

Oluwasey,i A. G.O and Habeeb, O. A. (2024). A systematic review of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: The emergence of 4IR. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 20, Issue 7, July 2024, Article No: em2478; https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14762.

Park, J., Bryant, D.P., and Shin, M. (2021). Effects of Interventions Using Virtual Manipulatives for Students With Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of Single-Case Research Volume 55, Issue 4 SAGE journals; https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211006336

Phanphech, P., Tanitteerapan, T., & Murphy, E. (2019). Explaining and enacting for conceptual understanding in secondary school Physics. Issues in Educational Research, 29(1), 2019

Powell, S.R., Bouck, E.C., Sutherland, M., Clarke, B., Arsenault, T.L., and Freeman-Green, S. ( 2023). Essential Components of Math Instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, Vol. 6

Rabab, B. & Veleo, A. (2015). Spatial visualization on mediating between mathematics learning strategy and mathematics achievement among 8th Grade students. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 8(5). ISSN: 1913-9020

Satsangi, R., Billman, R. H., Raines, A. R., & Macedonia, A. M. (2021). Studying the impact of video modeling for algebra instruction for students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 55(2), 67-78.

Senyefia, B. (2017). Effect of Physical and Virtual Manipulatives on the Mathematical Achievement of Junior High School Students in the Topic of Transformation in Ghana. Bosson-Amedenu Asian Research Journal of Mathematics, 4(4): 1-14, 2017; Article no.ARJOM.34238. ISSN: 2456-477X

DOI: 10.9734/ARJOM/2017/34238

Shin, M., and Bryant, D.P., (2016). Virtual Manipulatives: Tools for Teaching Mathematics to Students With Learning Disabilities; SAGE Journals Volume 52, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216644830

Shin, M., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., McKenna, J. W., Hou, F., & M. W. (2017). Virtual manipulatives: Tools for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52, 148–153. doi:10.1177/1043451216644830

Solaiman, N. P. (2013). Assessment of the Van Hiele levels of Geometric Conceptual Understanding in Selected Secondary Public Schools in Lanao del

Sur. Paper Presented at the 9th International Biennial Conference of the Philippine Council of Mathematics Educators

Solaiman, N. P. (2014). The mathematical ideas involved in Maranao weaving. Paper Presented at the 10th Special International Biennial Conference of the Philippine Council of Mathematics Educators

Solaiman, N. P. (2015). Some of the factors affecting the Grade - 7 performances in

mathematics. Presented at the 10th Special International Biennial Conference of the Philippine Council of Mathematics Educators

Such, J. & Moyer - Packenhem, P. S. (2016). How affordances and constraints of physical and virtual manipulatives support the development of procedural fluency and algorithmic thinking in mathematics. RIPEM, 6(2),

- 265

Svensson, C., & Holqust, M. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ procedural and conceptual understanding of pupils’ mean value knowledge in grade 6. International electronic journal of mathematics education, 16(3), emo649. http://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11067

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.

Taley, I.B. (2023). Use of manipulatives for mathematics teaching and learning. Trends in Primary and Secondary School Mathematics Education. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376313200


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 54 times
PDF - 5 times

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jkpm.13.1.2026.56-60

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika

Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika | P-ISSN: 2339-2444 E-ISSN: 2549-8401

 

Creative Commons Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika | P-ISSN: 2339-2444 E-ISSN: 2549-8401