Forensic Accounting and Ethical Governance in Subsidised Energy Distribution: Evidence from Indonesia
(1) Institut Agama Islam Syubbanul Wathon
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study examines how forensic accounting mechanisms, when complemented by maqāṣid al-sharīʿah–based ethical principles, can strengthen accountability, transparency, and fairness in Indonesia’s subsidised LPG distribution system. Specifically, it explores governance challenges—including weak internal controls, information asymmetry, ethical dilemmas, and limited public accountability literacy—and develops an integrative accountability framework to support ethical public governance. This study adopts an interpretive qualitative approach using in-depth interviews, limited field observations, and document analysis. Participants include government regulators, distribution agents, and public auditors involved in subsidy supervision. Data were analysed through thematic coding guided by forensic accounting indicators and maqāṣid-informed ethical considerations, with credibility ensured through triangulation and reflexive analysis. The findings indicate that governance inefficiencies largely arise from inadequate alignment between forensic control mechanisms and ethical accountability practices. While forensic accounting enhances transparency through evidence-based oversight, maqāṣid al-sharīʿah contributes an ethical foundation for distributive justice and public trust. Based on these findings, the study proposes an integrative accountability framework that connects technical control with ethical reasoning in public sector governance. The study suggests that policymakers strengthen fraud mitigation and governance quality by reinforcing forensic oversight alongside ethics-oriented capacity building grounded in principles of justice (‘adl), moral responsibility (amānah), and public welfare (maṣlaḥah). This study offers an integrative perspective on forensic accounting and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah in public sector governance, contributing to the literature on ethical accountability and value-based governance in subsidy management contexts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
References
Albrecht, W. Steve, and C. O. A. (2013). Fraud examination and prevention: A comprehensive framework. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 28, no. 4, 431-455.
Albrecht, C., Kranacher, M., & Albrecht, S. (2008). Asset Misappropriation Research White Paper for the Institute for Fraud Prevention.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law A Systems Approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Button, M., Johnston, L., & Frimpong, K. (2015). Fighting Fraud: The Case for a National Fraud Strategy. Criminal Justice Matters, 101(1).
Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2014). Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families. Security Journal, 27(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2012.11
Carnegie, G.D. and Napier, C.J. (1996). Critical and Interpretive Histories: Insights into Accounting’s Present and Future Through its Past. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol.9, No.
Cressey, D. (1954). Other people’s money : a study in the social psychology of embezzlement. https://doi.org/10.2307/1140029
Creswell, J. W. ., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publication.
Denzin, NK, & Lincoln, Y. (2018). Buku Pegangan Penelitian Kualitatif SAGE (edisi ke-5). Sage.
Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari`ah, Maslahah, and Corporate Social Responsibility. American Journal of Islam and Society, 24(1), 25–45.
Egon G. Guba ; Yvonna S. Lincoln. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publication.
Haniffa, R. and Hudaib, M. (2007). Exploring the Ethical Identity of Islamic Banks via Communication in Annual Reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 97–116.
Jack Bologna and Robert Lindquist. (1995). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications Inc.
Napier, C. (2009). Defining Islamic accounting: Current issues, past roots. Accounting History - Account Hist, 14, 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373208098555
Patton. M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage.
Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterrence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting.
Rezaee, Z., Sharbatoghlie, A., Elam, R., & McMickle, P. L. (2002). Continuous Auditing: Building Automated Auditing Capability. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.147
Tommie W. Singleton, A. J. S. (2010). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting, 4th Edition (4th Editio). WILEY.
Wells, J. T. (2008). Principles of Fraud Examination. John Wiley,.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/de93d85ebfbbde5fa75d9f66eee6156ce22b48eb
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 55 timesPDF - 0 times
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/mki.16.1.2026.129-135
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
![]() | MAKSIMUM: Media Akuntansi Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang |
![]()
Maksimum: Media Akuntansi Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
















