Moves Analysis on Abstracts Written by the Students in Academic Writing Class

Ajeng Setyorini

Abstract


This paper contains analysis results on abstracts written by students in Academic Writing course. The analysis includes analyses on moves and linguistic features. The analysis aims at finding out how the abstract writing structures of the English Education students are in the Academic Writing course. The abstract analysis also includes the analysis on the use of the linguistic features in the abstracts. The analysis uses a qualitative research approach. There are totally 10 abstracts that are analyzed. These are then called as the data. Data obtained is analyzed using genre analysis approach. Results of analysis on the 10 abstracts showed that some of the abstracts are written using 5 kinds of moves. All of the abstracts are found using Purpose Move and Method Move. Meanwhile, Situation Move is found in 5 abstracts. 8 abstracts are identified using Result Move. Conclusion Move is found in 5 abstracts. The results also show that all of the abstract writers use pronouns ‘the writer’ and ‘the researcher’. The use of personal pronoun ‘she’ is also found in 1 abstract. Hedges used in abstracts written by students in Academic Writing course vary from modal auxiliary verbs, adjectival, adverbial, nominal to Approximates of degree.

Keywords


genre; academic writing; abstract

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dudley-Evans, Tony. 1997. Genre Models for the Teaching of Academic Writing to Second Language Speakers: Advantages and disadvantages. In Tom Miller (ed.), Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications (pp.150-159). Washington: ELP US Information Agency.

Flowerdew, John. 2002. Academic Discourse. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Gerot, Linda and Peter Wignell. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Gerd Stabler.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Spoken and Written Language. Victoria: Deakkin University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnol

Halliday, M. A. K. and Cristian Matthiessen. 1999. Constructing Experience Through Meaning. London: Continuum.

Hyland, Ken. 2002. Teaching and Researching Writing. Harlow: Longman.

Isaac, Stephen and Michael, B. William. 1987. Handbook in Research and Evaluation. California: Edits Publishers.

Kies, Daniel. 2005. Writing an Abstract. http://papyr.com/hypertextbook/comp2/abstract.htm.

Kress, Gunther. 1985. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Kwan, Becky S. C. 2006. The Schematic Structure of Literature Reviews in Doctoral Theses of Applied Linguistics. www.sciencedirect.com.

Lakic Igor. 2000. Genre Analysis of Article Introductions in Economics. http://www. Institut.cg.yu/institute/projeckti.htm.

Lemke, J. L. 1987. Analysing Verbal Data: Principle, Methods, and Problems. http://academic.brooklyn.cury.edu/education/jlemke/theories.htm.

Marriam, S.B. 1998. Case Study Research in Education, a Qualitative Approach. London. Jossey Bass.

Martin, JR and David Rose. 2003. Working with Discourse. London: Continuum.

Nunan, D. 1992. Research method in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Safnil. 2000. Rhetorical Strcuture Analysis of the Indonesian Research Articles. Ph.D’d Dissertation. Australian Nationla University, Australia

Salager-Meyer, Francoise. 1997. I Think That Perhaps You Should: A Study of Hedges in Written Scientific Discourse. In Tom Miller (ed.), Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications (pp.105-118). Washington: ELP US Information Agency.

Samraj, Betty. 2002. Disciplinary Variation in Abstracts: The case of Wildlife Behaviour and Conservation Biology. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse (pp.40-56). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Schaefner, Christina. 2000. Available at/casetud/schaeffner2.htm.

Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.7.2.2017.167-178

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

 

 

Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya (Lensa)
p-ISSN: 2086-6100; e-ISSN: 2503-328X
Published by: Faculty of Foreign Language and Culture,Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang