Relational Values of Grammatical Features on Docudrama Social Dilemma: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Rina Mulya(1*)


(1) Universitas Negeri Medan
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study focused on the relational values of grammatical features in the docudrama film The Social Dilemma. The Social Dilemma is a docudrama that was released on Netflix in 2020 and it is the combination of documentary-style interviews with experts in the fields of technology, social media, and psychology, as well as dramatized sequences that illustrate the potential negative impacts of social media and technology on society. Relational values in critical discourse analysis (CDA) refer to how language is used to construct and negotiate social relationships between different groups and individuals. To conduct this study, the researcher used the main theory from Fairclough (2013) that focused on three grammatical features of the text: modes of sentence, modality, and pronouns. This study aims to understand how language is used to construct and maintain social relationships, to reveal the power dynamics that underlie communication in society, particularly in the docudrama film The Social Dilemma, and to describe it in the discussion. This study only analyzed the grammatical features of text expressed by some interviewees. This study used descriptive qualitative which is very common for conducting research in social sciences. This study also used critical discourse analysis (CDA) to provide a critical perspective on language use and its role in shaping social realities, power relations, and ideologies.


Keywords


relational values, grammatical features, critical discourse analysis, docudrama.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashfiasari, S. & Wiyata, M.T. (2021). Analisis Semiotika Film The Social Dilemma. NOUMENA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Keagamaan. Vol.2 No.1. pp. 44-54

Fairclough N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed). New York: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and Power. Abingdon. Oxon: Routledge.

Machin D. & Mayr A. (2012). How to do critical discourse Analysis: a multimodal introduction. London: SAGE.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. London: Sage

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and Descriptive Research: Data Types Versus Data Analysis. Language Teaching Research, 129-132.

Plantinga, C., & Smith, G. (2009). The Cognitive Impact of Film. England: Routledge.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and Discourse. How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, T.A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Taneen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin, The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 466-485). United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Wodak R. & Meyer M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. SAGE.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 157 times
PDF - 23 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Published by

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: [email protected]