Exploring Student’s Metacognitive Strategies Through Self-Reflection in Writing Assessments

Herry Augustinus Simarmata(1*), Siti Drivoka Sulistyaningrum(2)


(1) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(2) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Writing is used as a tool for communication as well as learning, thinking, and organizing knowledge or ideas. Unfortunately, In Indonesian context, English writing represents a skill that is seen as exceptionally challenging for students. This study aimed to look into the metacognitive strategies employed by EFL students who were considered successful in writing assessments. The participants were seven students of English Education Master’s Program at Universitas Negeri Jakarta who completed writing assessments at the C1 level on the website. The text analysis method was used in this study. At the end of the lesson, students' self-reflection was examined to determine their metacognitive strategies in the cognitive, social, affective, and motivational domains. Each student's metacognitive strategy applications were quantified, and the metacognitive strategy content was classified and reported interpretively. According to the findings, students are more likely to use a variety of metacognitive strategies with the cognitive domain being the most frequently used domain when completing writing assessments. They were discovered to be goal-oriented, with a greater likelihood of focusing not only on a course-related objective but additionally on an objective to improve their language learning abilities. Furthermore, this study suggests that self-reflection can be used to investigate students’ learning strategies and to promote students' control over the writing skills learning process.


Keywords


metacognitive strategies, self-reflection, writing assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, S. (2020). L2 Writing Strategies Used by High School Students. Professional Journal of English Education, 3(6), 805-815.

Bai, R. (2015). The effects of strategy-based writing instruction in Singapore primary school. System, 53, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.05.009

Bai, R., Hu, G., & Gu, Y. (2014). The relationship between writing strategies and English proficiency in Singapore primary schools. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0110-0

Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.

Chang, K. (2012). Fostering learner autonomy through empowering students in EFL writing. English Teaching & Learning, 36(3), 39-85.

Chen, Y. (2011). Study of writing strategies used by Chinese non-English majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 245-251.

Cohen, A. D. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). Harlow, Essex: Longman.

Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen, A. D. & Wang, I. K. (2018). Fluctuation in the functions of language learner strategies. System, 74, 169-182.

De Silva, R. & Graham, S. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on writing strategy use for students of different proficiency levels. System, 53, 47-59.

El-dib, M. A. B. (2004). Language learning strategies in Kuwait: Links to gender, language level, and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 85-92.

Farida, I. A., Suminar, D. R., & Nawangsari, N. A. F. (2017, October). Developing Scientific Thinking Through Inquiry Learning. In International Conference on Learning Innovation (ICLI 2017) (pp. 11-16). Atlantis Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.

Griffith, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367-383.

Haerazi, H., & Kazemian, M. (2021). Self-Regulated Writing Strategy as a Moderator of Metacognitive Control in Improving Prospective Teachers' Writing Skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 1-14.

Hochman, J., & Wexler, N. (2017). The writing revolution: A guide to advancing thinking through writing in all subjects and grades. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hu, G. W. & Chen, B. (2007). A protocol-based study of university-level Chinese EFL learners’ writing strategies. English Australian Journal, 23(2), 37-56.

Hu, G. (2016). Research in second language learner strategies: Past, present, and future. In Y. Leung (Ed.), Epoch making in English language teaching and learning (pp. 306-335). Taipei: Crane Publishing.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ismail, N., & Albakri, I. S. M. A. (2012). An Analysis of ESL Students' Attitude and Interest Towards Learning to Write Essays Using Selected Online Writing Links and Resources. International Journal Of Knowledge, Culture & Change Management, 11(6).

Ismail, N., Elias, S., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Perumal, P. D., & Muthusamy, I. (2010). Exploring ESL Students' Apprehension Level and Attitude towards Academic Writing. International Journal of Learning, 17(6).

Karlen, Y. & Compagnoni, M. (2017). Implicit theory of writing ability: Relationship to metacognitive strategy knowledge and strategy use in academic writing. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(1), 47-63.

Kobayashi, A. (2016). Examining a metacognitive instruction model. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 13(2), 117-137.

Kunasaraphan, K. (2015). English learning strategy and proficiency level of the first-year students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1853-1858.

Lee, K. R., & Oxford, R. (2008). Understanding EFL learners’ strategy use and awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 10(1), 7-32.

Lei, X. (2016). Understanding writing strategy use from a sociocultural perspective: The case of skilled and less skilled writers. System, 60, 105-116.

McAlister, A. M., Lee, D. M., Ehlert, K. M., Kajfez, R. L., Faber, C. J., & Kennedy, M. S. (2017, June). Qualitative coding: An approach to assess inter-rater reliability. Paper presented at the 124th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/78/papers/ 18189/view

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Harlow, UK: Pearson.

Oxford, R. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, California: Academic Press.

Pipattarasakul, P. & Singhasiri, W. (2018). Meta-strategies employed by science and engineering EFL learners in a speaking task. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(1), 66-81.

Rahmatunisa, W. (2014). Problems faced by Indonesian EFL learners in writing argumentative essay. English Review: Journal of English Education, 3(1), 41-49.

Todd, R. W., Khongput, S. & Darasawang, P. (2007). Coherence, cohesion, and comments on students’ academic essays. Assessing Writing, 12, 10-25.

Tuckman, B. W., & Kennedy, G. J. (2011). Teaching learning strategies to increase success of first-term college students. Journal of Experimental Education, 79, 478–504.

White, C., Schramm, K. & Chamot, A. (2007). Research methods in strategy research: Re-examining the toolbox. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 93-116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Winne, P. (2017). Cognition and metacognition within self-regulated learning. In P. A. Alexander, D. H. Schunk & J A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 36-48). Third Avenue, New York: Routledge.

Wong, L. & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39, 144-163.

Yang, M. (2007). Language learning strategies for junior college students in Taiwan: Investigating ethnicity and proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 35-57. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://asian-efl-journal.com/June_2007_EBook_editions.pdf

Yeung, M. (2016). Exploring the construct of learner autonomy in writing: The roles of motivation and the teacher. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 122-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p122

Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). San Diego, California: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909

Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.004

https://www.examenglish.com/CAE/cae_writing.html


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 168 times
PDF - 8 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Published by

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: [email protected]