“I feel so bad about making an excellent critical sentence”: Students' Voices through Photovoice in Academic Writing
(1) Universitas Negeri Medan
(2) Universitas Negeri Medan
(3) Universitas Negeri Medan
(4) Universitas Negeri Medan
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The academic writing challenges that students face have attracted the academics' interest in exploring deeper into the element that causes students' difficulties in composing academic writing using the academic writing difficulties approach. The goal of this study is to investigate academic writing challenges further. The researchers used the photovoice and qualitative research methods, with the exact procedure involved in the research process known as research design: briefing, photographing the objects or events, describing the objects or events, uploading the inspirational video and its question on social media, data gathering, classified, evaluating, and providing feedback, identifying and analysing some responses contextually and theoretically. The study's participants included students from various colleges and some social media users. The findings revealed five academic writing difficulties among 20 data samples: plagiarism, recognizing academic writing characteristics, combining ideas from various writing sources, lacking a distinct writing style, coherent writing, and linking theory to practice. The responses' most common academic writing challenge necessitates a unique writing style. It demonstrates that the participants need assistance with their writing style.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akkaya, A., & Aydin, G. (2018). Academics' Views on the Characteristics of Academic Writing. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(2), 128-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.143.7
Ang, S., Embi, M. A., & Yunus, M. M. (2017). Strategies of Successful English Language Learners among Private School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Humanoira, 5(2), 47-57.
Asmuti, W. (2002). A Correlation between the Vocabulary Mastery and the Writing Ability of the Second Year of the SMUN 06 Students of Bengkulu. Universitas Bengkulu.
Boczkowski, P. J., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2020). On Writing in Communication and Media Studies. International Journal of Communication, 14, Forum 410–416.
Braine, G & Yorozu, M. (1998). Local Area Network (LAN) Computers in ESL and EFL Writing Classes. JALT Journal, 20(2), 47-51
Brown, H D. (2007). Principles of Language and Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education Inc.
Bryne & Donn. (1988). Teaching Writing Skill. London: Longman Group Limited.
Deniz, K. E. M. A. L. E. T. T. İ. N., & Karagöl, E. (2017). AKADEMİK YAZMA AÇISINDAN MAKALE HAKEM DEĞERLENDİRME FORMLARI. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(34).
Denzin, N K & Lincoln, Y S. (2005). Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative research, ed Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 1-32. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Devlin, M & Gray, K. (2007). In Their Own Words: A Qualitative Study of the Reasons Australian University Students Plagiarize. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2): 181-198.
Fulwiler, T. (2002). College writing: A personal approach to academic writing. Heinemann, 88 Post Road West, PO Box 5007, Westport, CT 06881.
Heaton, JB. (1975). Writing English Language Tests. London: Longman.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar. New York, NY/London: Routledge.
Howard, R. M. (2002) Don’t police plagiarism: just teach!, Education Digest, 67 (5), pp. 46–50.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kellogg, R. T., Olive, T., & Piolat, A. (2007). Verbal, Visual, and Spatial Working Memory in Written Language Production. ACTA Psychologica. 124(3), 382-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.02.005
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2002). The Nations Report Card. Writing 2002 Major Results. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writing/results2002/.
Nickerson et al. (1985). The Teaching of Thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching, First Edition. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill Companies.
Phakiti, A & Li, L. (2011). General Difficulties and Reading and Writing Difficulties among Asian ESL Postgraduate Students in TESOL at an Australian University. RELC Journal, 42(3), 227-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688211421417
Pylkkänen & McElree. (2006). The Syntax-Semantics Interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50015-8
Raja, P., Flora., Putrawan, G. E., & Razali, A. B. (2022). English as an International Language: Perceptions of EFL Preservice Teachers in Higher Education Institutions in Indonesia. Education Research International, Article ID 3234983, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3234983
Tajeddin, Z., Alaeib, M. M., & Moladoust, E. (2023). Learners’ perspectives on imagined community of practice in English as an international language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(10), 893-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1921784
Tillayeva, SH. M. (2020). Learning English language is essential in today’s world. JournalNX- A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 6 (11), 354-357.
Tomlinson, Brian. 1998. Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B. & Masuhara, H. (2004). Developing Language Course Materials. Singapore: RELC.
Wang, C & Burris, M A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24 (3): 369-387.
Wenden, A. (1987). How to be a successful language learner: Insights and Prescriptions from L2 Learners. Learners Strategies in Language Learning, 103-117. Prentice/Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, N.Y
White, R., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process Writing. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Mahalingam, K., & Md. Yunus, M. (2016). Good language learners and their strategies: an insight. Proceedings of The ICECRS, 1(1), picecrs.v1i1.504. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v1i1.504
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 68 timesPDF - 21 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549
Published by
FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: [email protected]