PROKES IN TALK SHOW AND ELECTRONIC CINEMA: REPRESENTATION OF SOCIAL GROUPS’ RESPONSES TO KPI REGULATION

Agus Budi Wahyudi(1*), Laily Rahmatika(2)


(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Covid-19 pandemic has changed all lines of life, especially human hosts on talk shows and artists on electronic cinema are obliged to wear masks during the broadcast. The use of masks as an implementation of Prokes is accordance with KPI regulation to prevent the infection of Covid-19. The formulation of the research problem to describe how is the representation of social groups in responding to Deddy Corbuzier's post? The purpose of this research is to find the representation of social groups in responding to Deddy Corbuzier's post. The research design is in a qualitative with a descriptive approach. The research data are netizens expressions that come from Deddy Corbuzier's account. The data collection technique used was the observation and note-taking techniques. Data analysis uses critical discourse analysis and Representation with discursive constructs. The results show the representation of social groups that supported Deddy Corbuzier, as for the social groups: (1) verified accounts from the public figures (2) social groups of workers who presented complaints related to Prokes, and (3) unidentified groups represented variations such as KPI and electronic cinema. This offense is done by means of blasphemy, criticism, evaluation, and suggestions. The information representation of groups one and two are clear, while group three variegated cause conflict.

Keywords


Prokes in Talk Show and Electronic Cinema, Representation of Social Group, KPI Regulation, Discourse Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Mashabi, “UPDATE: Bertambah 11.278, Kasus Covid-19 Indonesia Capai 858.043 Orang,” Kompas, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/01/13/15532171/update-bertambah-11278-kasus-covid-19-indonesia-capai-858043-orang?page=all.

Ira, “Evaluasi Kepatuhan Televisi atas Protokol Kesehatan dalam Penyelenggaran Penyiaran di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 : Januari 2021,” Komisi Penyiaran Indones., 2021, [Online]. Available: http://kpi.go.id/index.php/id/umum/38-dalam-negeri/36110-siaran-pers-evaluasi-kepatuhan-televisi-atas-protokol-kesehatan-dalam-penyelenggaran-penyiaran-di-masa-pandemi-covid-19-januari-2021.

Z. Fatah and M. N. Fatanti, “Mempolitisasi Ruang Virtual: Posisi Warga-Net dalam Praktik Demokrasi Digital di Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Manaj. Publik dan Kebijak. Sos., vol. 3, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.25139/jmnegara.v3i1.1459.

S. Adam, I. Noviyanto, and A. Prasetyo, “The establishment of public opinion through social 18,” Syntax Admiration, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 145–161, 2021.

R. Ponika, N. Siregar, and R. Puspita, “Representasi Kritik Sosial Terhadap Polisi Pada Karikatur di Media Sosial,” J. Daring Mhs. …, pp. 19–26, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.ubharajaya.ac.id/index.php/jkom-mhsw/article/view/556.

R. Nasrullah, Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, Dan Sosioteknologi. Jakarta: Simbiosa Rektama Media, 2015.

J. Habermas, The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989.

‪Fransisco B. Hardiman, Demokrasi deliberatif: Menimbang ‗negara hukum‘ dan ‗ruang publik‘ dalam teori diskursus Jurgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2009.‬‬‬‬

T. Samsudin and N. A. Ahmad, “Disfemisme Warganet pada Komentar di Media Sosial Facebook dalam Tinjauan Semantik dan Hukum Islam,” J. Al-Himayah, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 255–280, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah.

F. W. Ramadhan, H. T. Sukmana, L. K. Oh, and L. K. Wardhani, “Analysis of Warganet Comments on It Services in Mandiri Bank Using K-Nearest Neighbor (K-Nn) Algorithm Based on Itsm Criteria,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2019, doi: 10.34306/ajri.v1i1.91.

I. D. Wijayanti, “Kesantunan Berbahasa Warganet Pada Kolom Komentar Akun Twitter Presiden Joko Widodo Berdasarkan Skala Kesantunan Leech,” Persepsi Masy. Terhadap Perawatan Ortod. Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pihak Non Prof., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2013.

P. A. Tarwiyati and A. Sabardila, “157 | J u r n a l L i t e r a s i Volume 4|Nomor 2|Oktober 2020,” J. Literasi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 2020.

L. Rahmatika and A. B. Wahyudi, “TTE masyakarat Jakarta terhadap banjir.pdf,” SeBaSa J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 186–198, 2020.

“Prespektif Pragmatik terhadap Tuturan Warganet atas Peristiwa Musibah Banjir di Jakarta,” pp. 22–28, 2020.

L. Rahmatika and A. B. Wahyudi, “Netizens’ Responses towards the Covid-19 Pandemic Text: A Study of Speech Acts and Their Contents,” J. Pragmat. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 177–200, 2020, doi: 10.18326/jopr.v2i2.178-201.

D. Yanti and R. B. Triadi, “Penggunaan Makian Bahasa Indonesia Pada Kolom Komentar Akun Instagram Lambe Turah (Kajian Sosiolinguistik),” J. Sasindo Unpam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 60–68, 2020.

L. Rahmatika, M. Laila, and A. B. Wahyudi, “Wacana Pemilihan Puteri Indonesia: Penolakan Dan Pembelaan Tanggapan Warganet,” GHANCARAN J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.19105/ghancaran.v0i0.3764.

A. Oya, M. Salahuddin, A.Haris, and L. Haryanto, “Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora,” J. Sos. dan Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 497–503, 2020.

E. Yusniar, “Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Menkumham Yasonna Laoly Tentang Kebijakan Pembebasan Narapidana Ditengah Wabah Covid-19 ( Media Online detik . com dan kompas . com ),” J. Polit. Indones., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2020.

S. Shorey, E. Ang, A. Yamina, and C. Tam, “Perceptions of public on the COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore: A qualitative content analysis,” J. Public Heal. (United Kingdom), vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 665–671, 2020, doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa105.

Y. R. Anggajaya and N. Alfinatullail, “Resepsi Warganet terhadap Berita COVID-19 dalam Media Warga di NTB,” Jimakom, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53–65, 2020.

I. Sarathan, R. Ridwansyah, and A. Pradana, “Respon Warganet Dan Analisis Semantik Berita Corona Di Cnn Indonesia Pada Media Sosial Twitter: Januari - Maret 2020,” Metahumaniora, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 198, 2020, doi: 10.24198/metahumaniora.v10i2.28505.

V. de Melo Resende, “A controversy in Folha de S. Paulo: Critical discourse reflections on the representation of homelessness and the coloniality of being,” Discourse Soc., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 584–606, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0957926520939686.

A. Osisanwo and O. Iyoha, “‘We are not terrorist, we are freedom fighters’: Discourse representation of the pro-Biafra protest in selected Nigerian newspapers,” Discourse Soc., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 631–647, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0957926520939687.

K. A. Sherwani, “Representing Eastern Spirituality in Elif Shafaks’ Novel ‘Forty Rules of Love’: A Critical Discourse Analysis,” J. Xidian Univ., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 215–219, 2020, doi: 10.37896/jxu14.4/029.

R. Y. Mahardika and F. Y. Ahmadi, “Representasi Wacana Berita Pilpres di Medsos,” Sematik, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2020, doi: 10.22460/semantik.vXiX.XXX.

‪Norman Fairclough, Language and Power, 2nd ed. Rotledge, 2013.‬‬‬‬

S. Hall, Representation: Cultural Representations And Signifying Practices. London: SAGE, 1997.

J. D’Onfro, “Instagram is Introducing ‘Verified Badges’ for Public Figures,” Insider, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.com/instagram-verified-badges-2014-12?r=US&IR=T.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 358 times
PDF - 57 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Published by

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: [email protected]