REFUSAL STRATEGIES AND POLITENESS IN VIRTUAL COMMUNICATION: A CYBERPRAGMATICS STUDY

Dinda Noor Azizah(1*), Dadang Sudana(2)


(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to investigate the use of speech act refusal strategies in virtual communication via instant message application, WhatsApp. This study uses cyberpragmatics and relative relations studies to determine the form of a politeness strategy for the participants who are involved in virtual communication. The object studied are screenshots of the WhatsApp chat between a banker and a prospective bank customer which is analyzed by using a qualitative descriptive and Discourse Completion Task (DCT) methods. The results showed that the dominant refusal strategy that emerged was the indirect refusal strategy, which included reason, statement of regret, and promise of future acceptance. Also, the use of negative politeness has a more tendency towards the use of refusal strategies.


Keywords


Cyberpragmatics, Refusal Strategies, Politeness, Relative Relation, Virtual Communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


F. Yus, Cyberpragmatics Internet-mediated communication in context, vol. 213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2011.

J. Searle and D. Vandervenken, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. London: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

H. J. Chen, “Cross-Cultural Comparison of English and Chinese Metapragmatic in Refusal,” 1996.

N. Wayan Sartini, “Politeness in E-mail of Konferensi Linguistik Universitas Airlangga (KLUA) 2018 Presenters: Cyberpragmatics Review,” Int. Conf. Lang. Phenom. Multimoda Commun., vol. 228, 2018.

L. M. Beebe, T. Takashi, and R. Uliss-Weltz, “Pragmatic Transfer in ESL Refusals,” 1990.

R. Lakoff, “What You Can Do With Words: Politeness, Pragmatics, and Performatives.,” Proc. Texas Conf. Performatives, Presuppositions Implicatures, pp. 79–106, 1977.

P. Brown and S. C. Levinson, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

E. A. Aziz, “Indonesian speech act realisation in face-threatening situations,” Monash Univ. Linguist. Pap., vol. 2, pp. 15–41, 2000.

N. Chojimah, “Refusal and Politeness Strategies in Relation to Social Status: A Case of Face-threatening Act among Indonesian University Students,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 5, no. 5, p. 906, May 2015, doi: 10.17507/tpls.0505.04.

F. M. Precisely, “REQUEST STRATEGIES USED BY MALE AND FEMALE ENGLISH FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNERS,” 1st English Lang. Lit. Int. Conf., pp. 309–314, 2011.

K. Rahardi, PRAGMATIK: Konteks Ekstralinguistik dalam Perspektif Cyberpragmatics, Edisi Pert. Yogyakarta: Amara Books, 2020.

J. Holmes, An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, 2008.

F. Yus, “Contextual constraints and non-propositional effects in WhatsApp communication,” J. Pragmat., vol. 114, pp. 66–86, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003.

R. Sahragard and F. Javanmardi, “English Speech Act Realization of ‘Refusals’ among Iranian EFL Learners,” Cross-Cultural Commun., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 181–198, 2011.

N. Harared, “Investigating Refusal Strategies in Situational Comedy: A Case Study of Sheldon Cooper, Ph.D,” 2020.

N. S. Rahayu, “REFUSAL STRATEGY PERFORMED BY INDONESIAN EFL LEARNER,” Indones. EFL J., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 67, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.25134/ieflj.v5i1.1612.

R. Al-Mahrooqi and K. Al-Aghbari, “Refusal Strategies Among Omani EFL Students,” SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 4, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2158244016672907.

A. J. Emike, “Refusal Strategies in Offers and Directives: An Overview of Selected Texts from Radio Drama Episodes,” Bull. Adv. English Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2019, doi: 10.31559/baes2019.2.1.2.

S. Sofaer, “Articles Qualitative Methods: What Are They and Why Use Them?,” HSR Heal. Serv. Reseacrh, 1999.

W. Permataningtyas and T. J. P. Sembodo, “Refusal Strategies in Two Harry Potter Movies,” LEXXICON, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 2018.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 322 times
PDF - 64 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549

Published by

FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: [email protected]