KELAYAKAN INSTRUMEN PENGEMBANGAN PENILAIAN HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS SISWA SMA PADA MATERI EKOSISTEM

Kusuma Wardany(1*)


(1) Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) assessment employed Borg and Gall (1983)’s modified Research and Development (R&D). The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of HOTS assessment instruments on ecosystem material. The sample of development included 4 validating experts, 40 students in limited test, 140 students in field test using Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) assessment. Data analysis was carried out using Quest program. The result of research showed that (1) the characteristics of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) assessment was developed based on, among others, Anderson and Krathwohl’s indicator of higher-order thinking skill in ecosystwith validity and reliability interpreting as having very high mean, at least low in ecosystem material.The results of the validation of the instrument of assessment instrument in each expert validator are having a good content and concept validation to be applied in school, of course after the revision.

Keywords


Assessment, Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiken, Lewis R. (1994).Psychological Testingand Assessment,(EightEdition). USA: Addison Wesley Longman.

Anastasi, Anne and Urbina, Susana. (1997). Psichological Testing. (Seventh Edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,Inc

Anderson, W. L & Krathwohl, R, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assesing A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.

Aprianto. (2008). Implementasi Sistem Sistem Manajemen Mutu ISO 9001: 2008 Berdasarkan Pada 8 (delapan) prinsip manajemen mutupada SMK Negeri 13 Bandung. Universitas Tekhnilogi Bandung: Bandung

Arifanni, Kanti. 2013. Pengembangan Subject Spesific Pedagogy (SSp) Matematika Pada Materi Bangun Prisma Berbasis Tahap Berpikir Van Hiele Dan Teori Bruner Untuk Peserta Didik SMP/MTs Kelas VIII. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kali Jaga Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2007). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara

Basuki, Ismet, & Hariyanto. (2012). Assesmen Penelitian. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset

Bloom. (1964).Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain Butkowski, Jean. 1994. Improving Student Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Tesis, Educational Resources Information Center

Borg and Gall. (1983). Educational Research, An Introduction (4th Ed). Newyork and London. Longman Inc.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

BSNP. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia No 42 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses. Jakarta: BSNP

Budiman, Agus. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika SMP Kelas VIIISemester 1. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, Volume 1, No 2, Novermber 2014

Campbell, Neil A., Reece, Jane B., & Mitchell, Lawrence G. (2004). Biology Edisi Kelima Jilid 3. Erlangga : Jakarta

Gronlund, M. S and Linn, Joyce. (1995). Measurement And Assesment In Teaching. Prentice-Hall, Pearson Education Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

Heong, Y. M, Widad B. O,Jailani B. M. Y, Tee T.K, Razali B. H,and Mimi M.B.M.(2011). TheLevelof Marzano Higher Order ThinkingSkills among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 1, No. 2.

Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Ghalia Indonesia: Bogor

Kartowagiran, Badrun. (2011). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Pembelajaran DiSekolahBertarafInternasional.UniversitasNegeriYogyakarta: Yogyakarta

Kemendikbud. (2013) . Permendikbud No. 81A tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Kind, V. (2009) 'Pedagogical content knowledge in science education : potentialand perspectivesforprogress.',Studiesin science education., 45 (2). pp. 169-204.

King, JF; Goodson, Ludwika, dan Rohani, Faranak, (2010). Higher Order Thinkin Skills, Definition, Teaching Strategis, Assesment. A Publication of The Educational Services Program. www.Cala.fsu.edu.

Krathwohl, Bloom & Masia. (1964). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:Handbook II Krathwohl, D. R.2002. A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: an overview - Theory Into Practice,College of Education, The Ohio State University Learning Domains or Bloom's Taxonomy: The Three Types of Learning, tersedia di www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html

Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining Higher Order Thingking. Theory Into Practice, XXXII (3), 131-137

Lewy.(2009).PengembanganSoalUntukMengukurKemampuanBerpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pokok Bahasan Barisan dan Deret BIlangan di KElas IX Akselerasi SMP Xaverius maria Palembang.Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika,Volume3. No.2,Desember2009.UniversitasSriwijaya: Palembang

Lissa. (2012). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Materi Sistem Respirasi dan Ekskresi. Universitas Negeri Semarang: Semarang

Madhuri,G.V.,Kantamreddi,V.S.S.N.,danGoteti,L.N.S.P.(2012).Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills using inquiry-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 37, No. 2, 117–123

Mardapi, Djemari. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen dan Nontes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Offset

Munthe, Bermawi. (2012). Desain Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Insan Madani

Nitko, Anthony J. (1996). Educational Assessment of Students, Second edition. Ohio: Merrill an imprint of Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs.

Nofiana, Mufida. (2013). Pengembangan Instrumen Evalusi Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Pada Materi Kingdom Plantae. Universitas Sebelas Maret: Surakarta

Ogawa, M. (1995). Science Education In AMultiscience Perspective. Science Education, 79, 593– 593.

Ong, A & Borich.G.D. 2006. Teaching Strategies That Promote Thinking:Modeland CuriculumApproaches.Singapore:Mc Graw Hill.

Partnership for 21st century Skill. (2009). 21st Century Skills Map.http://science.nsta.org/ps/Final21stCenturyMapScience.pdf. Diakses 1 maret 2015

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2007). PeraturanMenteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2007Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar danMenengah. Jakarta : Depdiknas

Poerwanti,E.(2001).EvaluasiPembelajaran,ModulAktaMengajar.UMM. Press.

Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Puspendik. (2011). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP:Belajar dari PISA dan TIMMS. Jakarta: Puspendik, Balitbang Depdiknas.

Rahayu. (2008). Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian Dalam PendidikanMatematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) di SMPN 17 Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol 2, No. 2, Juli – Desember 2008.

Reynold, C.R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2010). Measurement and Assesment in Education. Pearson Eucation, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458. Pearson.

Rochmah, Tyagita F. (2013). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa Kelas X-G MAN Malang 1. Universitas Negeri Malang: Malang

Rofiah, E, Nonoh S. A, dan Elvin Y.E. (2013). Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika Pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika. ISSN: 2338-0691. Surakarta: FKIP Fisika UNS.

Sajidan, Sugiharto B. & Prasetyani, N.M. (2013). Penerapan Dan Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan Melalui Lesson Studi Pada MataPelajaran Biologi Berbasis Pemetaan Ketuntasan UN Biologi, Laporan Hibah Guru Besar. LPPM : UNS

Shchur, N.M., 2014. Pre-Service Biology Teacher Preparation in the Usa And Ukraine: Comparative Study of Professional Education Training. American Journal of Educational Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 5, 278-282

Slameto (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta

Subali, Bambang. (2010). Penilaian, Evaluasi dan Remediasi Pembelajaran Biologi. UNY: Yogyakarta

Sudjana, Nana. (2009). Penilain Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung:Remaja Rosdakarya

Sudjana,Nana(2010).PenilaianHasilProsesBelajarMengajar.Bandung:Remaja Rosdakarya

Sukiman. 2012. Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pendajogja

Sungarimbun, Masri dan Sofian Effendi.(2008). Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: LP3ES

Suparman,Atwi. (2012). Desain Instruksional Modern. Bandung: Erlangga

Surapranata, S., (2005). Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes. Implementasi kurikulum 2004. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset

Susongko, Purwo. (2010). Perbandingan Keefektifan Bentuk Tes Uraian Dan Testlet Dengan Penerapan Graded Response Model (GRM). UPS : Tegal

Suwandi, Sarwiji. (2009). Model Asesmen Dalam Pembelajaran. Mata Padi Presindo: Surakarta

Tatat Hartati, Yahya Sudarya, Tatang Suratno, dan Effy Mulyasari. (2009). Pedagogic produktif dan subject specific pedagogy. Bandung: UPI

Wardana,N.(2010).PengaruhModelPembelajaranBerbasisMasalahdan Ketahan malangan Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi danPemahama Konsep Fisika.http://jurnal.pdii.lipi.go.id/admin/jurnal/621016251635_1858-4543.pdf


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 801 times
PDF - 149 times

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.6.2.2018.21-31

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS (JPS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY EDUCATION
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES
MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG UNIVERSITY

Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
    Telp. (024)76740231, 76740231
    email: jps@unimus.ac.id


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Journal Pendidikan Saisn (JPS)
ISSN:2339-0786, e-ISSN:2502-1443
Published by: Chemistry Education, Muhammadiyah Semarang University