The Readiness of Private Higher Education Institutions in Indonesia to Adopt Blockchain Technology in Accounting Information Systems

Ratih Hayu Rani(1), Suryo Pratolo(2*)


(1) Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(2) Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to evaluate the readiness of Private Higher Education Institutions (HEI) in Indonesia to adopt blockchain technology. Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, this research explores the factors influencing the acceptance of blockchain technology, including Relative Advantage, Accounting Information Quality, Trust, Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Intention to Use. Blockchain, as a decentralized, transparent, and secure technology, has the potential to enhance the accounting systems in Private HEIs. However, the adoption of this technology in the education sector remains at an early stage. This study uses a quantitative approach, with surveys distributed through questionnaires to financial department heads in accredited Private HEI across Indonesia. The findings show that Relative Advantage and Accounting Information Quality have a significant positive impact on Performance Expectancy, while Trust strongly influences Effort Expectancy. Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy contribute to the Intention to Use blockchain in Private HEI. This study contributes to the literature on blockchain adoption, particularly in the context of higher education, by emphasizing the potential of this technology to create more efficient, transparent, and secure accounting systems in Private HEI. These findings aim to provide practical guidance for higher education institutions and stakeholders in preparing for successful blockchain implementation.


Keywords


Blockchain, Private HEI, UTAUT, Education, Accounting Information System

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abreu, P. W., Aparicio, M., & Costa, C. J. (2018). Blockchain technology in the auditing environment. 2018 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI),

Abu Afifa, M. M., Vo Van, H., & Le Hoang Van, T. (2023). Blockchain adoption in accounting by an extended UTAUT model: empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(1), 5-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2021-0434

Agbo, C. C., Mahmoud, Q. H., & Eklund, J. M. (2019). Blockchain technology in healthcare: a systematic review. Healthcare,

Aggarwal, S., Chaudhary, R., Aujla, G. S., Kumar, N., Choo, K.-K. R., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2019). Blockchain for smart communities: Applications, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 144, 13-48.

Ahl, A., Yarime, M., Tanaka, K., & Sagawa, D. (2019). Review of blockchain-based distributed energy: Implications for institutional development. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 107, 200-211.

Akaba, T. I., Norta, A., Udokwu, C., & Draheim, D. (2020). A framework for the adoption of blockchain-based e-procurement systems in the public sector: A case study of Nigeria. Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology: 19th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2020, Skukuza, South Africa, April 6–8, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 19,

Akbar, R., Pilcher, R., & Perrin, B. (2012). Performance measurement in Indonesia: the case of local government. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(3), 262-291.

Alammary, A., Alhazmi, S., Almasri, M., & Gillani, S. (2019). Blockchain-based applications in education: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 9(12), 2400.

Alazab, M., Alhyari, S., Awajan, A., & Abdallah, A. B. (2021). Blockchain technology in supply chain management: an empirical study of the factors affecting user adoption/acceptance. Cluster Computing, 24(1), 83-101.

Alkafaji, B. K. A., Dashtbayaz, M. L., & Salehi, M. (2023). The Impact of Blockchain on the Quality of Accounting Information: An Iraqi Case Study. Risks, 11(3), 58.

Alketbi, A., Nasir, Q., & Talib, M. A. (2018). Blockchain for government services—Use cases, security benefits and challenges. 2018 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T),

Andoni, M., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Abram, S., Geach, D., Jenkins, D., McCallum, P., & Peacock, A. (2019). Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 100, 143-174.

Angraal, S., Krumholz, H. M., & Schulz, W. L. (2017). Blockchain technology: applications in health care. Circulation: Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 10(9), e003800.

Appelbaum, D., & Smith, S. S. (2018). Blockchain basics and hands-on guidance: taking the next step toward implementation and adoption. The CPA Journal, 88(6), 28-37.

Arndt, T., & Guercio, A. (2020). Blockchain-based transcripts for mobile higher-education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 84-89.

Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The journal of strategic information systems, 17(2), 165-176.

Bhaskar, P., Tiwari, C. K., & Joshi, A. (2020). Blockchain in education management: present and future applications. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-07-2020-0102

Casino, F., Dasaklis, T. K., & Patsakis, C. (2019). A systematic literature review of blockchain-based applications: Current status, classification and open issues. Telematics and informatics, 36, 55-81.

Chaerunisyah, A. (2021). Analisis Pengelolaan Pendidikan Tinggi Swasta Di Indonesia Sebagai Entitas Corporat Non Profit Dan Upayanya Dalam Mempertahankan Eksistensi. Abiwara: Jurnal Vokasi Administrasi Bisnis, 3(1), 15-19.

Chen, G., Xu, B., Lu, M., & Chen, N.-S. (2018). Exploring blockchain technology and its potential applications for education. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1), 1-10.

Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Xie, H., & Jong, M. (2023). Blockchain in smart education: Contributors, collaborations, applications and research topics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4597-4627.

Choi, T.-M., & Siqin, T. (2022). Blockchain in logistics and production from Blockchain 1.0 to Blockchain 5.0: An intra-inter-organizational framework. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 160, 102653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102653

Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward Blockchain-Based Accounting and Assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51804

Dajani, D., & Yaseen, S. G. (2016). The applicability of technology acceptance models in the Arab business setting. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 10(3).

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.

Faccia, A., Al Naqbi, M. Y. K., & Lootah, S. A. (2019). Integrated cloud financial accounting cycle: how artificial intelligence, blockchain, and XBRL will change the accounting, fiscal and auditing practices. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Cloud and Big Data Computing,

Falwadiya, H., & Dhingra, S. (2022). Blockchain technology adoption in government organizations: a systematic literature review. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 15(3), 473-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-09-2021-0079

Fanning, K., & Centers, D. P. (2016). Blockchain and its coming impact on financial services. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 27(5), 53-57.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Gräther, W., Kolvenbach, S., Ruland, R., Schütte, J., Torres, C., & Wendland, F. (2018). Blockchain for education: lifelong learning passport. Proceedings of 1st ERCIM Blockchain workshop 2018,

Grech, A., & Camilleri, A. F. (2017). Blockchain in education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Hair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.

Häkkinen, A., & Koskinen, P. D. J. (2023). Blockchain in Enterprise Solutions: Assessing the Suitability of Blockchain for Corporate Sustainability Reporting Master’s thesis, University of Turku].

Hameed, B., Khan, M. M., Noman, A., Ahmad, M. J., Talib, M. R., Ashfaq, F., Usman, H., & Yousaf, M. (2019). A review of Blockchain based educational projects. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(10).

Han, M., Li, Z., He, J., Wu, D., Xie, Y., & Baba, A. (2018). A novel blockchain-based education records verification solution. Proceedings of the 19th annual SIG conference on information technology education,

Hanim, Z., Anggal, N., & Sanda, Y. (2023). Strategi pembiayaan pendidikan pada perguruan tinggi keagamaan Katolik swasta untuk pemenuhan capaian kinerja. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 604-614.

Hendriyati, H., Wahid, S. M., Fitriani, A., & ariq, M. f. (2023). Analisa Peluang Penerapan Teknologi Blockchain dan Gamifikasi pada Pendidikan. Jurnal MENTARI: Manajemen, Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.33050/mentari.v1i2.250

Holotescu, C. (2018). Understanding blockchain opportunities and challenges. Conference proceedings of» eLearning and Software for Education «(eLSE),

Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS quarterly, 465-485.

Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Randall, T. (2003). Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7), 715-741. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00033-3

Jariyapan, P., Mattayaphutron, S., Gillani, S. N., & Shafique, O. (2022). Factors influencing the behavioural intention to use cryptocurrency in emerging economies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Based on technology acceptance model 3, perceived risk, and financial literacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 814087.

Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Arha, H. (2019). Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2009-2033.

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

Köhler, S., & Pizzol, M. (2019). Life cycle assessment of bitcoin mining. Environmental science & technology, 53(23), 13598-13606.

Le, T. T., Nguyen, T. L., Trinh, M. T., Nguyen, M. H., Nguyen, M. P. T., & Pham, H.-H. (2021). Adopting the Hirschman–Herfindahl Index to estimate the financial sustainability of Vietnamese public universities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-10.

MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of retailing, 88(4), 542-555.

Mahankali, S., & Chaudhary, S. (2020). Blockchain in education: a comprehensive approach–utility, use cases, and implementation in a university. In Blockchain technology applications in education (pp. 267-293). IGI global.

Martino, P., & Martino, P. (2021). Blockchain and banking business models. Blockchain and Banking: How Technological Innovations Are Shaping the Banking Industry, 53-69.

Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), 1-20.

Mettler, M. (2016). Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here. 2016 IEEE 18th international conference on e-health networking, applications and services (Healthcom),

Morkunas, V. J., Paschen, J., & Boon, E. (2019). How blockchain technologies impact your business model. Business Horizons, 62(3), 295-306.

Murphy, R., Scott-Clayton, J., & Wyness, G. (2019). The end of free college in England: Implications for enrolments, equity, and quality. Economics of Education Review, 71, 7-22.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Satoshi Nakamoto.

Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. In (Vol. 34, pp. 355-364): Elsevier.

Rashideh, W. (2020). Blockchain technology framework: Current and future perspectives for the tourism industry. Tourism Management, 80, 104125.

Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Choosing the number of categories in agree–disagree scales. Sociological methods & research, 43(1), 73-97.

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.

Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117-2135.

Salman, M. D. (2022). Higher Education between funding pressures and Academic Independence in Iraq. Social Science Learning Education Journal, 7(01), 09-15.

Shen, C., & Pena-Mora, F. (2018). Blockchain for cities—a systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 6, 76787-76819.

Shmueli, G., & Koppius, O. R. (2011). Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 553-572.

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European journal of marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.

Sofyani, H. (2023). Penentuan Jumlah Sampel pada Penelitian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Berpendekatan Kuantitatif. Reviu Akuntansi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 7(2), 311-319.

Trabulsi, R. U. (2018). The impact of accounting information systems on organizational performance: The context of Saudi’ s SMEs. International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(2), 69-73.

Turkanović, M., Hölbl, M., Košič, K., Heričko, M., & Kamišalić, A. (2018). EduCTX: A Blockchain-Based Higher Education Credit Platform. IEEE Access, 6, 5112-5127. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2789929

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.

Wei, X., Yan, Y., Guo, S., Qiu, X., & Qi, F. (2021). Secure data sharing: blockchain-enabled data access control framework for IoT. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(11), 8143-8153.

Wong, L.-W., Tan, G. W.-H., Lee, V.-H., Ooi, K.-B., & Sohal, A. (2020). Unearthing the determinants of Blockchain adoption in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2100-2123.

Wu, J., Xiong, F., & Li, C. (2019). Application of Internet of Things and blockchain technologies to improve accounting information quality. IEEE Access, 7, 100090-100098.

Yang, G. (2022). Optimization of university financial services using the blockchain technology. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 2680366.

Yıldırım, A. A., & Kelten, G. S. (2021). Blockchain technology and its potential effects on accounting: A systematic literature review. Istanbul Business Research, 50(2), 495-515.

Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.-N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International journal of web and grid services, 14(4), 352-375.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 113 times
PDF - 0 times

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/mki.14.2.2024.257-274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MAKSIMUM: Media Akuntansi Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang 
ISSN 2087-2836 (print) | ISSN 2580-9482 (online)
Organized by Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
Published by Program Studi Akuntansi Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
W : https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/MAX
E : [email protected], [email protected]

Maksimum: Media Akuntansi Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.