.png)
AI-Driven Dynamics: ChatGPT Transforming ELT Teacher-Student Interactions
(1) English Letters Department, Universitas Sanata Dharma
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving educational domain, where artificial intelligence (AI) is pivotal, English Language Teaching (ELT) witnesses profound transformations. This study, focusing on integrating ChatGPT, an AI-driven language model, illuminates its substantial impact on the dynamics between teachers and students within ELT. Pertinent to this research is the inquiry into how ChatGPT reshapes teacher roles, responsibilities, and pedagogical practices, an area previously overlooked in the realm of AI in education. Employing a theoretical lens, the study scrutinises active learning models, technology integration theories, and paradigms of teacher professional development. Such analysis is crucial in comprehending teachers' shift from traditional methodologies to more facilitative and supportive roles, emphasising the urgency of this investigation for active learning's progression. Utilising diverse analytical approaches, ChatGPT propels pedagogies encouraging active learning, notably blended, collaborative, and project-based learning, while accentuating the necessity of professional development and institutional support for teachers' successful transition to these novel roles. These findings offer pivotal insights for the higher education sector, underlining the imperative of embracing AI's transformative potential, particularly tools like ChatGPT. By delving into ChatGPT's influence on teacher-student interaction and pedagogical methods, the study carves a significant path for future exploration and application in technology-enhanced ELT.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Harbi, S. S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2016). The flipped classroom impact in grammar class on EFL Saudi secondary school students' performances and attitudes. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 60-80.
Almubarokah, Q., & Arifani, Y. (2021). Teachers’ perspective of distance learning tv in teaching speaking during covid-19. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 11(2), 252-267.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Aoun, J. E. (2017). Robot-proof: higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. MIT press.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20.
Baskara, F. R., & Mukarto, F. X. (2023). Exploring the Implications of ChatGPT for Language Learning in Higher Education. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 7(2), 343-358.
Bazerman, C., & Prior, P. (2004). What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analysing texts and textual practices. Routledge.
Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2019). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2487-2502.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). George Washington University.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2017). e-Learning ecologies: Principles for new learning and assessment. Routledge.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
Graesser, A. C., Li, H., & Forsyth, C. (2014). Learning by communicating in natural language with conversational agents. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 374-380.
Graham, C. RR. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960.
Heift, T., & Schulze, M. (2019). Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning: Parsers and pedagogues. Routledge.
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205-218.
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is 'enhanced' and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36.
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 00336882231162868.
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 34-37.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lestari, K., & Budianto, L. (2022). The Experiences of EFL Teachers Teaching English Skills and Contents in the Midst of Covid-19 Pandemic. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 12(1), 100-112.
Lin, C. H. (2018). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality. ReCALL, 30(1), 38-57.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education.
Majumdar, S. (2015). Emerging trends in ICT for education & training. Gen. Asia Pacific Reg. IVETA.
Martin, S. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence, mixed reality, and the redefinition of the classroom. Rowman & Littlefield.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Passey, D. (2019). Developing inclusive practices with technologies for online teaching and learning: A theoretical perspective. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 34(2), 156-169.
Pegrum, M. (2009). From blogs to bombs: The future of digital technologies in education. University of Western Australia Press.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. Orion Press.
Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2016). AI as a methodology for supporting educational praxis and teacher metacognition. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 679-700.
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2010). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In H. Reinders, S. T. Ryan, & S. A. Lazaraton (Eds.), Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching: The Case of Thailand (pp. 47-65). Palgrave Macmillan.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
Sharma, H., Soetan, T., Farinloye, T., Mogaji, E., & Noite, M. D. F. (2022). AI adoption in universities in emerging economies: Prospects, challenges and recommendations. In Re-imagining Educational Futures in Developing Countries: Lessons from Global Health Crises (pp. 159-174). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Stickler, U., & Hampel, R. (2020). Transforming teaching: New skills for online language learning spaces. In R. Hampel & U. Stickler (Eds.), Developing Online Language Teaching: Research-Based Pedagogies and Reflective Practices (pp. 21-38). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sujiatmoko, A. H. (2021). Students’ Elements of Motivation in Joining the EFL Virtual Classroom Using the Zoom Application During the Covid 19 Pandemic. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 11(2), 194.
Tegmark, M. (2018). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Vintage.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2019). Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalised learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Computers & Education, 159, 104058.
Yilmaz, R. M. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 260-270.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 202 timesPDF - 1 times
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.13.2.2023.261-275
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya (Lensa)
p-ISSN: 2086-6100; e-ISSN: 2503-328X
Published by: Faculty of Educational Science and Humanity,Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
