Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Ridwan Kamil dalam 'Talkshow Insight' di CNN Indonesia (The Form and Type of Illocutionary Speech Acts Ridwan Kamil in the 'Insight Talkshow' at CNN Indonesia)

Veranita Ragil Sagita(1*), Teguh Setiawan(2)


(1) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY)
(2) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY)
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan (1) bentuk tindak tutur ilokusi, dan (2) jenis tindak tutur ilokusi di CNN Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian deskripsi kualitatif. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah tuturan yang diucapkan oleh Ridwan Kamil pada acara talkshow insight di CNN Indonesia periode 2017-2018. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik simak bebas libat cakap (SBLC) dan teknik catat. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah peneliti sendiri (human instrument). Instrumen penelitian kemudian divalidasi oleh expert judgment. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode padan pragmatis dan metode agih. Berdasarkan analisis data dapat ditarik dua simpulan. Pertama, bentuk tindak tutur ilokusi yang ditemukan berupa deklaratif, imperatif, dan interogatif. Kedua, jenis tindak tutur ilokusi yang ditemukan berupa asertif, direktif, komisif, dan ekspresif.

Kata kunci: pragmatik, tindak tutur, ilokusi, dan talkshow.

 

ABSTRACT

This study aims to describe (1) the form of illocutionary speech acts, and (2) the types of illocutionary speech acts on CNN Indonesia. This research is a type of qualitative description research. The data source in this study is the utterances uttered by Ridwan Kamil on talkshow insights on CNN Indonesia for the 2017-2018 period. The data collection technique in this study is the skillful free listening technique (SBLC) and note taking technique. The research instrument used in this study was the researcher himself (human instrument). The research instrument was then validated by expert judgment. The data analysis technique in this study uses the pragmatic equivalent method and the agih method. Based on data analysis, two conclusions can be drawn. First, the forms of illocutionary speech acts found are declarative, imperative, and interrogative. Second, the types of illocutionary speech acts found were assertive, directive, commissive, and expressive.


Keywords


pragmatics; speech act; illocutionary; talkshow

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altikriti, S. F. (2011). Speech Act Analysis to Short Stories. Finland: Academy Publisher, 2(6), 1374-1375.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cutting, J. (2003). Pragmatics and Discourse. London: Routledge.

Denzin, N. K. (2009). Handbook of Qlitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustakan Pelajar.

Horn, L. (2007). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Australia: Blackwell.

Koutchade, I. S. (2017). Analysing Speech Acts in Buhari’s Address at the 71st Session of the UN General Assembly. Australia: Australian International Academic Centre. 6(3), 226.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mey, L. J. (1993). Pragmatics: an Intoduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

Nadar, F.X. (2009). Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Olagunju, S. (2016). Pragmatic Functions in 2010 World Cup Football Matches in Selected Print Media in Nigeria. Nigeria: An International Peer-review Journal. 23, 52-53.

Parker, F. (1946). Linguistics for Non Linguist. London: Tylor and Francis, Ltd.

Purwo, B. K. (1994). Pelba 7: Analisis Klausa, Pragamatik Wacana, Pengkomputeran Bahasa. Yogyakarta:Kanisius.

Putrayasa, I. B. (2014). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta:Graha Ilmu.

Rahardi, K. (2005). Pragmatik : Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Searle, J. R. (1974). Studies in the Theory of Speech Act: expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sudaryanto. (2001). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Pers.

Sudaryanto. (2014). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung:Alfabeta.

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1272 times
PDF - 5 times

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.9.2.2019.187-200

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

 

 

Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya (Lensa)
p-ISSN: 2086-6100; e-ISSN: 2503-328X
Published by: Faculty of Foreign Language and Culture,Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

 

Member of: