.png)
Kenomotetisan dan Keideosinkretisan Makna Simbolis Peranti Pernikahan Adat Masyarakat Nusa Tenggara Timur dan Jambi: Perspektif Ekolinguistik
(1) Sanata Dharma University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini dirumuskan sebagai berikut: (1) mendiskripsikan nilai-nilai nomotesis yang terdapat dalam peranti pernikahan adat masyarakat Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) dan Provinsi Jambi; (2) mendeskripsikan nilai-nilai ideosinkretis yang terdapat dalam peranti pernikahan adat masyarakat Provinsi NTT dan Provinsi Jambi? Data dikumpulkan dengan menerapkan metode simak dan metode cakap. Selain itu, data juga dikumpulkan dengan menerapkan prinsip-prinsip etnografi dalam antropolinguisitk. Data selanjutnya diklasifikasi dan ditipifikasi sehingga terwujud tipe-tipe data yang siap untuk dikenai metode dan teknik analisis data. Adapun metode analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitia ini adalah metode analisis padan kontekstual. Selain itu, metode analisis distribusional juga diterapkan untuk mendukung penerapan metode analisis padan kontekstual. Metode analisis padan dan metode analisis distribusional tersebut dilengkapi dengan teknik analisis yang lazim diterapkan dalam penelitian etnografi dan metode analisis ini. Manfaat teoretis penelitian ini adalah untuk menyempurnakan teori-teori ekolinguistik yang selama ini didasarkan pada teori-teori Barat. Manfaat praktisnya adalah untuk memaksimalkan perkuliahan ekolinguistik yang selama itu belum kontekstual di program-program magister. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat enam nilai kenomotetisan makna simbolis peranti pernikahan adat masyarakat NTT, dan masyarakat Jambi yang dikaji dengen perspektik ekolinguistik metaforis. Keenam nilai simbolik yang bersifat nomotetis tersebut disampaikan sebagai berikut: (1) nilai cinta kasih, (2) nilai ekonomis, (3) nilai kekeluargaan, (4) nilai keagungan, (5) nilai religius. Selanjutnya nilai-nilai simbolik pernikahan adat di kedua provinsi tersebut memiliki nilai-nilai keideosinkretisan sebagai berikut: (1) nilai keharmonisan, (2) nilai ketulusan, (3) nilai pengharapan, (4) nilai penghormatan terhadap wanita.
Kata Kunci: kenomotetisan; keideosinkretisan; makna simbolik; ekolinguistik metaforis
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was formulated as follows: (1) describing the nomothetic values of traditional marriage equipments of the people of East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) and Jambi societies; (2) describing the ideosyncretic values contained in the traditional marriage tools of the people of NTT and Jambi societies? Data was collected by applying the listening method and the interview method. In addition, data are also collected by applying ethnographic principles in anthropology. The data collected are then classified and typified to realize the types of data that are ready to be subjected to data analysis methods and techniques. The data analysis method used in this research is the contextual equivalent analysis method. In addition, the distributional analysis method is also applied to support the application of the contextual equivalent analysis method. The equivalent analysis method and the distribution analysis method are complemented by analytical techniques commonly used in ethnographic research. The theoretical benefit of this research is to perfect ecolinguistic theories that have been based on Western theories. The practical benefit is to maximize ecolinguistic lectures which have not been contextual in the master's programs. The results of this research showed that there were six values of symbolic meaning of the traditional marriage tools of the NTT community, and that of the people of Jambi which were studied with a metaphorical ecolinguistic perspective. The six symbolic values that are nomothetic in nature are conveyed as follows: (1) the value of love, (2) economic value, (3) family value, (4) grandeur value, (5) religious value. Furthermore, the symbolic values of traditional marriage in the two communities have the following ideological ideals: (1) harmony, (2) sincerity, (3) expectation, (4) respect for women.
Keywords: nomothetics; ideosyncratic; symbolic meaning; metaphorical ecolinguistics
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alexander, J. C. (2006). Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616839.002
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2003). Face and politeness: New (insights) for old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X
Chen, J. (2017). Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2016.1204903
Cuddy, A. J. C., Wolf, E. B., Glick, P., Crotty, S., Chong, J., & Norton, M. I. (2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000027
Enfield, N. J. (2009). Relationship thinking and human pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.007
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2015). Assessing Second Language Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.016
Gerbig, A. (2003). The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment. Current Issues in Language Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200308668051
Gintis, H. (2016). Homo Ludens: Social rationality and political behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.01.004
Gretsch, C. (2009). Pragmatics and integrational linguistics. Language and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.02.010
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean : explorations in the development of language. Explorations in language study. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50025-1
Haviland, W. A., Prins, H. E. L., McBride, B., & Walrath, D. (2011). Cultural anthropology: The human challenge. Journal of Computer Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522
Hodgkin, R. (2003). Homo Ludens. In The Passion to Learn: An Inquiry into Autodidactism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203329108
Jacobs, G. M. (2017). Ecolinguistics and education. In The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687391
Kramsch, C. (2011). Language and culture. In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835654
Kravchenko, A. V. (2016). Two views on language ecology and ecolinguistics. Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.12.002
Limberg, H. (2015). Principles for pragmatics teaching: Apologies in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv012
Locher, M. A. (2013). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002
Luardini, M. A., & Simbolon, M. (2016). Ecolinguistics for teaching English. Asian EFL Journal.
Miller, V. (2017). Phatic culture and the status quo: Reconsidering the purpose of social media activism. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856515592512
Mills, S. (2009). Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.014
Peace, A., & Mühlhäusler, P. (2006). Environmental Discourses. Annual Review of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123203
Rahardi, R. Kunjana., Setyaningsih, Y. (2019). Contextualizing Local Values of Children’s Games in the Perspective of Ecopragmatics to Enhance Culture-Specific Based Communication. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 9(Issue-1, October 2019), 143–151. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.A1096.109119
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2009). Pragmatik: Kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2010). Sosiopragmatik (1st ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2017a). Linguistic Impoliteness in The Sociopragmatic Perspective. Jurnal Humaniora. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v29i3.24954
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2017b). Pragmatic Phenomena Constellation in Specific Culture Dimension Language Study. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010109
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2018a). Elemen dan Fungsi Konteks Sosial, Sosietal, dan Situasional dalam Menentukan Makna Pragmatik Kefatisan Berbahasa. In Prosiding Seminar Tahunan Linguistik Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (SETALI 2018) (pp. 654–658). Bandung: Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Bandung.
Rahardi, R. Kunjana. (2018b). Konstelasi Kefatisan dalam Teks-teks Natural Religius dengan Latar Belakang Kultur Spesifik. In Prosiding Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia 2018 (pp. 274–279). Manokwari, Papua Barat: MLI.
Rahardi, R K. (2018). Phatic Language in a Specific Culture Perspective in the Context of Internationalization of the Indonesian Language. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2720
Rahardi, R Kunjana, Setyaningsih, Y., & Dewi, R. P. (2019). Iconic Meanings of Traditional Herbs and Shrubs : Culture-Specific Based Envirolinguistic Perspective, (2), 1986–1992. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.B2530.129219
Science, L., Company, P., Long, M. H., Canagarajah, S., Peterson, R. A., Nagel, J., … Backus, A. (2017). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(88)90022-X
Scott-Phillips, T. C. (2017). Pragmatics and the aims of language evolution. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1061-2
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499
Wimberley, E. T. (2017). Ecopragmatics. Ecopragmatics. https://doi.org/10.18848/978-1-61229-613-5/cgp
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 548 timesPDF - 7 times
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.10.1.2020.69-82
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya (Lensa)
p-ISSN: 2086-6100; e-ISSN: 2503-328X
Published by: Faculty of Educational Science and Humanity,Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
