BRIDGING THE GAP: REFLECTIONS ON EAP MATERIALS AT PHARMACY ACADEMY OF SURABAYA
(1) Akademi Farmasi Surabaya
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the course module used in EAP teaching at Pharmacy Academy of Surabaya. The coursebook was evaluated in terms of its subject matter, structure and capability to meet students‘ need. Two instruments were employed to draw potential strengths and weaknesses of the coursebook. Firstly, an evaluation checklist adapted from several literatures was designed to serve teachers’ perspective about the coursebook. Secondly, a set of questions was constructed to observe students‘ feedback. Surprisingly, the result of the study shows that eight chapters presented in the module are, considerably, more appropriate for EGAP class rather than ESAP class. Besides, it was found that each chapter is less-defined as every of them is organized differently. Furthermore, the whole aspects conclude that a lot of room remains for improvement for the materials in order to meet the students‘ need.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
K. Hyland, & L. Hamp-Lyons, “EAP: issues and directions,” Journal of English for Academic Purposes., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2002.
E. de Chazal, “The general-specific debate in EAP: Which cases is the most convincing for most contexts?” Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 135-148, 2012.
J-Y. Liu, Y-J. Chang, F-Y. Yang, & Y-C. Sun, “Is what I need what I want? Reconceptualising college students’ needs in English courses for general and specific/academic purposes,” Journal of English for Academic Purposes., vol. 10, pp. 271-280, 2011.
I. McGrath, Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. 2nd Ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2002.
B. Tomlinson, Developing materials for language teaching Second. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013, pp-21-44.
M. Charles, & D, Pecorari, Introducing English for academic purposes. New York: Routledge, 2016.
B. Tomlinson, “Developing criteria for evaluating L2 materials,” IATEFL Issues. vol. 147, pp. 10-13, 1999.
J. McDonough, C. Shaw, & H. Masuhara, Materials and methods in ELT: a teacher's guide. 3rd Ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
R. Ellis, “The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials,” ELT Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 1997.
J. C. Richards, Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Z. R. Eslami, "Teachers' Voice vs. Students' Voice: A Needs Analysis Approach to English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Iran," English Language Teaching, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3-1, 2010.
BALEAP Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes, BALEAP, Aug. 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/teap-competency-framework.pdf
H. Tok, “TEFL textbook evaluation: From teachers’ perspectives,” Educational Research and Review., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 508-517, 2010.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 355 timesPDF - 44 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549
Published by
FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: [email protected]
