.png)
Rhetorical Moves of Research Article Abstracts Written by American and Indonesian Authors : Comparative Study
(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
(2) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(3) Universitas Negeri Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
As an indispensable part of the Research Article (RA), an abstract should be well written. The variability of information included in a research article abstract will likely vary because of different discourses among academicians worldwide. This paper compares the rhetorical moves manifested in research article abstracts written by American and Indonesian authors published in two reputable journals. Data presented are move sequences of 25 Research Article (RA) abstracts from the latest six years issue (2022-2016). The abstracts were selected from a particular discipline, English language teaching and learning, to control the variability. Each move was identified based on the lexical used. The findings revealed that Move 1-Move 2-Move 3-Move 4-Move 5 and Move 2-Move 3-Move 4-Move 5 were the most salient move patterns found in both groups. Interestingly, abstracts of American authors showed cyclicity patterns and had an additional Move. Move 3 and Move 4 were considered as obligatory Moves, while Move 1 and Move 5 could be positioned as optional Moves. The study also found that American and Indonesian authors' writing styles differed. The implication of this study is expected to strengthen the theory of rhetorical moves in the literature. Also, it can be scientific evidence for Indonesian scholars to get a reference of how native academicians write their abstracts in reputable international journals
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2017). A Genre Analysis of Research Article Abstracts Written by Native and Non-Native Speakers of English. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(1), 1–13.
Amalia, A. S., Kadarisman, E., & Laksmi, E. D. (2018). The Rhetorical Moves in Indonesian EFL Thesis Abstracts across Educational Levels. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 6(2), 99–107. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jph/article/view/11475
Andika, R. P., Safnil, & Harahap, A. (2018). Rhetorical Moves and Linguistic Features of Journal Article Abstracts by Postgraduate Students, National and International Authors in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 3(1), 14–27. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/joall/article/view/6539
Asari, S. (2018). Rhetorical Moves in English Language Teaching and Learning Research Articles Written by Indonesian English Academics [Unpublished dissertation]. Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Calzada, A., & Mayo, M. del P. G. (2021). Effects of Proficiency and Collaborative Work on Child EFL Individual Dictogloss Writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20003.cal
Farnia, M., & Barati, S. (2017). Writing Introduction Sections of Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Cross-Linguistic Study of Native and Non-Native Writers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 486–494. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8357
Gee, J. P. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Haque, T. N. (2017). Analysis of Linguistic and Discourse Features of the Essays Written for the York English Language Test. GSTF Journal on Education, 4(2).
Honami, L. N., & Chalak, A. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Architecture Research Article Abstracts Written by Native and Non-native Authors: A Cross-linguistic, Cross-cultural Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0803.08
Irawati, L., Saukah, A., & Ruslan, S. (2018). Indonesian Authors Writing their Discussion Sections both in English and Indonesian Research Articles. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.21536
Li, X. (2020). Mediating Cross-cultural Differences in Research Article Rhetorical Moves in Academic Translation: A Pilot Corpus-based Study of Abstracts. Lingua, 238, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102795
Revesz, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2017). IELTS Research Reports Online Series-Investigating IELTS Academic Writing Task 2: Relationships between Cognitive Writing Processes, Text Quality, and Working Memory.
Setyorini, A. (2017). Moves Analysis on Abstracts Written by the Students in Academic Writing Class. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan Dan Budaya, 7(2), 167–178.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts. USA: The University of Michigan Press.
Tajeddin, Z., & Pakzadian, M. (2020). Representation of Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Varieties and Cultures in Global ELT Textbooks. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00089-9
Yin, B. (2016). An Exploratory Genre Analysis of Three Graduate Degree Research Proposals in Applied Linguistics. Functional Linguistics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0032-2
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 305 timesPDF - 9 times
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.13.1.2023.82-94
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya (Lensa)
p-ISSN: 2086-6100; e-ISSN: 2503-328X
Published by: Faculty of Educational Science and Humanity,Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
