PRODUCTION OF RELATIVE CLAUSES BY ENGLISH LEARNERS IN KAMPUNG INGGRIS PARE KEDIRI
(1) Gadjah Mada University
(2) Gadjah Mada University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to describe relative clauses produced by English Learners in Kampung Inggris Pare Kediri. The description of relative clauses produced is to know the kind of relative clauses English learners can and cannot produce. Data was obtained from learners’ essay in IELTS simulation test part writing. Result says that English Learners can only produce relative clauses which relativize H as subject with 85.7% of percentage, as object with 8.5%, and as adverb with 5.8% of percentage. RCs whose H position is in possessive, object of preposition, and indirect object do not appear in the data. While for relational relative clause, cleft relative clause is also not produced by learners. Further, error analysis says that the errors learners produce are divided into six types: 1) error in using relativizer, 2) producing unneeded relative clauses, 3) The absence of relative pronouns, 4) Error in using verb in relative clause, and 5) Error in H-V agreement.53.4%
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alla, Ahmed Saber Abd, Klausa Relatif Bahasa Indoesia dan Klausa Relatif Bahasa Inggris, Sebuah Studi Kontrastif: Thesis. ETD UGM, 2008.
Berg, Lidy Van Den & Klingenman, Klausa Relatif Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Muna in Lontara No 34: 5-25. Ujung Pandang: Universitas Hasanuddin, 1986.
Budiarti, Any, Interferensi Bahasa Indonesia Ke Dalam Bahasa Inggris Pada Abstrak Jurnal Ilmiah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni Vol. 41. 2013.
Bennui, P, A study of L1 interference in the writing of Thai EFL students: Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 4, 72-102, 2008.
Dalilan & Mulyono, Klausa Relatif Bahasa Inggris dan Bahasa Indonesia: Analisis Kntrastif Strategi Perelatifan, Fungsi, dan Alat Perelatif: HUMANIKA Vol. 17, 2004.
DeCapua, A, Grammar for Teachers: A Guide to American English for Native and Non Native Speakers, New York: Springer, 2008.
Ellis, R, Second Language Acquisition, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L, Second Language Acquisition An Intoductory Course (ed. 3), New York: NY Routledge, 2008.
Hogbin, Elizabeth & Song, Jae Jung, The Accessibility Hierarchy in Relativisation: The Case of Eighteenth and Twentieth-Century Written English Narrative: SKY Journal of Linguistics Vol. 20, 2007.
Huddleston, R.D & G. Pullum, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Keenan, Edward L. & B. Comrie, Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry 8:63-99, 1977 via JSTOR URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177973
Kridalaksana, H, Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008.
Nurmayanti, Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua Anak (Studi Kasus di Briton International School), Thesis. Yogyakarta: UGM, 2012.
Pradjarto, Sutoto, J.C, Interferensi Gramatikal Bahasa Indonesia Ke Dalam Bahasa Inggris Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kemampuan Produktif Pembelajar Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Pemula, Jurnal Penelitian dan Wacana Pendidikan Vol. 9, 2015.
Sari, Anggun Melati, et al, Penggunaan Klausa Relatif Pada Pembelajar Bipa di Unit Pelaksana Teknis (UPT) Bahasa Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Jurnal Diglossia Vol. 9, 2017.
Suharsono, Pemerolehan Klausa Relatif Pada Pemelajar Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Penutur Asing (Bipa): Kajian Bahasa-Antara, Journal LITERA Vol.14, 2015.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 532 timesPDF - 83 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Electronic ISSN: 2579-7263
CD-ROM ISSN: 2579-7549
Published by
FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND CULTURE
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Phone: +622476740295, email: [email protected]
