The Descriptive Analysis of TPACK Components in Chemistry Learning Tools for The Electrolyte and Non-electrolyte Solutions Materials

Rifanny Rizka Putri(1*), Muhaimin Muhaimin(2), Sutrisno Sutrisno(3)


(1) Jambi University
(2) Jambi University
(3) Jambi University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions were chemical materials that had three levels of representation. However, during the learning process there were still many learning difficulties. One of the factors that students experience difficulty in learning was that teachers were not optimal in planning lessons. However, in the process of achieving learning objectives, it was necessary to had optimal learning planning. One of the optimal learning plans was obtained by preparing learning instruments such as lesson plans and e-LKPD which integrated TPACK. This research was a descriptive study which aims to analyzed descriptively the TPACK components in the developed chemistry learning tools. The data collection techniques in this study used document study techniques, interviews, and surveys. The data instruments used in obtaining information were questionnaires, interview guideline sheets, and previous articles. Researchers took samples by purposive sampling. The research subjects were students and teachers of class X IPA SMA in Jambi City. Based on the analysis conducted by researchers through data collection instruments, it can be concluded that this learning tool has integrated Technology, Pedagogic, and Content Knowledge components.

Keywords


TPACK Framework, TPACK Analysis, Electrolyte and Non electrolyte Solution, Science Process Skills, Learning Tools

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Tabany, T. I. B. (2014). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. RINEKA CIPTA.

Davidowitz, B., Chittleborough, G., & Murray, E. (2010). Student-generated submicro diagrams: a useful tool for teaching and learning chemical equations and stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3).

Eko Yulianto, & Rohaeti, E. (2013). Pengembangan majalah kimia untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan kreativitas peserta didik kelas x SMA N 1 Mlati. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 01(1), 26–36.

Gunawan, D., Sutrisno, & Muslim. (2020). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran matematika berdasarkan TPACK untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2).

Hayati, D. K., Sutrisno, & Lukman, A. (2014). Pengembangan Kerangka Kerja TPACK pada Materi Koloid untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Pembelajaran dalam Mencapai HOTS Siswa. Edu-Sains, 3(1), 53–61.

Mahpur, M. (2017). Memantapkan Analisis Data Melalui Tahapan Koding. In Repository Universitas Islam Negeri Malang (pp. 1–17). Retrieved from http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/800/2/koding.pdf

Mairisiska, T., Sutrisno, & Asrial. (2014). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis TPACK pada Materi Sifat Koligatif Larutan untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Edu Sains, 3(1), 28–37.

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.

Medina, P. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa kelas X pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Non Elektrolit serta Reaksi Oksidasi dan Reduksi dalam Pembelajaran Kimia di SMAN 10 Kota Padang. Journal Of Residu, 1(1), 73–84.

Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. , (2013).

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2013). Designing Effective Instruction (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Mulyatiningsih, E. (2013). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning – especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z

Nurlaili, Bakar, A., & Afrida. (2019). Analisis Keterlaksanaan Model Pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Nonelektrolit dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. 11(1), 28–37.

Rezba, R. J., Sprague, C. R., McDonnough, J. T., & Matkins, J. J. (2007). Learning & Assessing Science Process Skills (Fifth Edit). United States: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Suari, N. N. J., Selamat, I. N., & Suja, I. W. (2018). Profil Model Mental Siswa Tentang Larutan Elektrolit Dan Nonelektrolit. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 2(2), 59–63.

Sutrisno. (2011). Pengantar Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.

Warsono, & Hariyanto. (2012). Pembelajaran Aktif dan Teori Assesment. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wilandari, D. N., Ridwan, A., & Rahmawati, Y. (2018). Analisis Model Mental Siswa pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Nonelektrolit: Studi Kasus di Pandeglang. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2), 25–35.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 766 times
PDF - 119 times

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.9.2.2021.126-136

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS (JPS)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY EDUCATION
FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES
MUHAMMADIYAH SEMARANG UNIVERSITY

Jl. Kedungmundu Raya No.18, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
    Telp. (024)76740231, 76740231
    email: jps@unimus.ac.id


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Journal Pendidikan Saisn (JPS)
ISSN:2339-0786, e-ISSN:2502-1443
Published by: Chemistry Education, Muhammadiyah Semarang University