Process Mining for Characterizing Adverse Event Transition Patterns in GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Using OpenFDA Data
(1) STMIK Methodist Binjai
(2) Sari Mutiara University of Indonesia
(3) Sari Mutiara University of Indonesia
(4) Mitra Bangsa University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The increasing use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) highlights the importance of adverse event monitoring as part of pharmacovigilance. Conventional analyses generally focus on event frequency, leaving transition patterns among adverse events within individual reports insufficiently explored. This study aims to analyze adverse event reporting transition patterns associated with GLP-1 RAs using process mining based on OpenFDA Harmonized Fields. Data were obtained from the OpenFDA Drug Adverse Event API, sourced from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), covering the 2023–2025 period for semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and tirzepatide. A total of 188,734 reports were extracted and processed through cleaning, normalization, deduplication, and event log construction, resulting in 496,212 event records from 188,247 cases. The 25 most frequently reported adverse events were selected for analysis, with 48,429 cases containing at least two events. Directly-Follows Analysis identified Nausea → Vomiting as the transition with the highest frequency, occurring 4,459 times. For tirzepatide, the transition Incorrect dose administered → Injection site pain occurred 2,267 times. Comparison of the Heuristics Miner and Inductive Miner showed that the Heuristics Miner achieved precision values of 0.9671–0.9909 and F-scores of 0.8474–0.8682, whereas the Inductive Miner achieved a fitness of 1.0000 with precision values of 0.5315–0.7481. Based on the balance of evaluation metrics, the Heuristics Miner was used as the primary model for transition analysis. The results demonstrate that process mining can be used to explore the structure of adverse event reporting transitions associated with GLP-1 RA therapies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
“Pharmacovigilance: ensuring the safe use of medicines.” Accessed: Sep. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHOEDM2004.8
C. for D. E. and Research, “FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS) Public Dashboard,” FDA, Mar. 2026, Accessed: Sep. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fda-adverse-event-monitoring-system-aems/fda-adverse-event-monitoring-system-aems-public-dashboard
O. of the Commissioner, “Data Mining at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,” FDA, Nov. 2022, Accessed: Sep. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/science-research/data-mining/data-mining-center-biologics-evaluation-and-research
“openFDA.” Accessed: Sep. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://open.fda.gov/apis/drug/event/?
“openFDA.” Accessed: Sep. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://open.fda.gov/apis/drug/event/
O. of the Commissioner, “Data Mining at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,” FDA, Nov. 2022, Accessed: Sep. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/science-research/data-mining/data-mining-center-biologics-evaluation-and-research
K. Niu, M. Fan, W. Gao, C. Chen, and G. Dai, “Adverse events in different administration routes of semaglutide: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system,” Front. Pharmacol., vol. 15, p. 1414268, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1414268.
Y. Shu, X. He, P. Wu, Y. Liu, Y. Ding, and Q. Zhang, “Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with semaglutide: A pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system,” Front. Public Health, vol. 10, p. 996179, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.996179.
Y. Du et al., “A real-world disproportionality analysis of semaglutide: Post-marketing pharmacovigilance data,” J. Diabetes Investig., vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1422–1433, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1111/jdi.14229.
L. He et al., “Pharmacovigilance study of GLP-1 receptor agonists for metabolic and nutritional adverse events,” Front. Pharmacol., vol. 15, p. 1416985, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1416985.
M. Tobaiqy, “A review of serious adverse events linked with GLP-1 agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity treatment,” Pharmacol. Rep. PR, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 981–990, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43440-024-00629-x.
M. Bhattacharyya, L. E. Miller, A. L. Miller, and R. Bhattacharyya, “Mortality and Serious Adverse Events Associated With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System,” Cureus, vol. 16, no. 8, p. e65989, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.7759/cureus.65989.
H. Chen et al., “Pharmacovigilance analysis of neurological adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 18063, May 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01206-9.
L. Liu, “A real-world data analysis of tirzepatide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database,” Front. Pharmacol., vol. 15, p. 1397029, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1397029.
H. Chen, Y. Ding, and Y. Shan, “Post-marketing safety monitoring of tirzepatide: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database,” Expert Opin. Drug Saf., vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 959–967, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2468860.
Y. Ou et al., “Analysis of tirzepatide in the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS): a focus on overall patient population and sex-specific subgroups,” Front. Pharmacol., vol. 15, p. 1463657, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1463657.
Z. Zhang, J. Li, J. Zheng, Y. Liang, L. Ma, and L. Su, “Tirzepatide safety in type 2 diabetes: a disproportionality analysis of adverse events using the FDA FAERS database,” Endocr. Connect., vol. 14, no. 7, p. e250205, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1530/EC-25-0205.
S. Xiong et al., “Adverse Events of Oral GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (Semaglutide Tablets): A Real-World Study Based on FAERS from 2019 to 2023,” Diabetes Ther. Res. Treat. Educ. Diabetes Relat. Disord., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1717–1733, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01594-7.
W. van der Aalst, “Process Mining in the Large,” in Process Mining: Data Science in Action, W. van der Aalst, Ed., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2016, pp. 353–385. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4_12.
J. Munoz-Gama et al., “Process mining for healthcare: Characteristics and challenges,” J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 127, p. 103994, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.103994.
E. De Roock and N. Martin, “Process mining in healthcare - An updated perspective on the state of the art,” J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 127, p. 103995, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.103995.
F. Caron, J. Vanthienen, K. Vanhaecht, E. Van Limbergen, J. Deweerdt, and B. Baesens, “A process mining-based investigation of adverse events in care processes,” Health Inf. Manag. J. Health Inf. Manag. Assoc. Aust., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2014, doi: 10.1177/183335831404300103.
L. Aversano, M. Iammarino, A. Madau, G. Pirlo, and G. Semeraro, “Process mining applications in healthcare: a systematic literature review,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 11, p. e2613, 2025, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2613.
K. Chen, F. Abtahi, J.-J. Carrero, C. Fernandez-Llatas, and F. Seoane, “Process mining and data mining applications in the domain of chronic diseases: A systematic review,” Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 144, p. 102645, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102645.
A. Pika, M. T. Wynn, S. Budiono, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, W. M. P. van der Aalst, and H. A. Reijers, “Privacy-Preserving Process Mining in Healthcare,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 1612, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051612.
W. M. P. van der Aalst, “Foundations of Process Discovery,” in Process Mining Handbook, W. M. P. van der Aalst and J. Carmona, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 37–75. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08848-3_2.
S. K. L. M. vanden Broucke and J. De Weerdt, “Fodina: A robust and flexible heuristic process discovery technique,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 100, pp. 109–118, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.04.005.
M. Fantinato, S. M. Peres, and H. A. Reijers, “X-Processes: Process model discovery with the best balance among fitness, precision, simplicity, and generalization through a genetic algorithm,” Inf. Syst., vol. 119, p. 102247, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.is.2023.102247.
S. Namaki Araghi, F. Fontanili, E. Lamine, U. Okongwu, and F. Benaben, “Stable heuristic miner: Applying statistical stability to discover the common patient pathways from location event logs,” Intell. Syst. Appl., vol. 14, p. 200071, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200071.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 89 timesPDF - 17 times
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jichi.v7i2.22677
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
____________________________________________________________________________
Journal of Intelligent Computing and Health Informatics (JICHI)
ISSN 2715-6923 (print) | 2721-9186 (online)
Organized by
Department of Informatics, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology
Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
W : https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ICHI
E : [email protected]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





